2012 SANFL Crowd figures

Hi Spelly. I am missing most of this years crowd figures. Would you be able to post them or post a link to them.
I usually get them from Monday's Advertiser but unfortunately it's not delivered to Melbourne anymore.

They are all in "Crowd Watch" section of the FOOT-e TIMES SA each week.

If a crowd figire is not posted in the paper (has happend about five times this year) we ring up the club to confirm to attendance.

In addition, last Wednesday's issue did a comparison of all clubs home match crowds compared with same time last year and total 2011 figure.

Worringly 5 SANFL clubs based on same number of home games in 2011 are down by over 18% this season.

There is also now a home match crowds ladder each Wednesday. Amazingly Eagles are up to 3rd (won't stay there) ahead of Central and Sturt whilst North are 9th.

You can subscribe to FOOT-e TIME SA for a flat rate of $1 an issue, minimum 10 issues. Just speak to the site Admin.

If I subscibe now, will I get the back issues?

PhilH wrote:They are all in "Crowd Watch" section of the FOOT-e TIMES SA each week.

If a crowd figire is not posted in the paper (has happend about five times this year) we ring up the club to confirm to attendance.

In addition, last Wednesday's issue did a comparison of all clubs home match crowds compared with same time last year and total 2011 figure.

Worringly 5 SANFL clubs based on same number of home games in 2011 are down by over 18% this season.

There is also now a home match crowds ladder each Wednesday. Amazingly Eagles are up to 3rd (won't stay there) ahead of Central and Sturt whilst North are 9th.

You can subscribe to FOOT-e TIME SA for a flat rate of $1 an issue, minimum 10 issues. Just speak to the site Admin.

Could you post them for MR66 then ?

Take the silence as a know. Surprise .............. Bit of a trend with a few on some sites. Disappointing really , first to come in with some info but when questionned go missing.

Yes, we were waiting for PhilH to answer that, but he must have missed it.

If you subscribe, I think we could arrange access to the back issues.

To subscribe, just PM 'Admin' or 'redandblack' for payment details ansd we'll give you immediate access.

That offer is open to all.

I'll get on to PhilH to get a reply from him on this...

waddayamean wrote:Take the silence as a know. Surprise .............. Bit of a trend with a few on some sites. Disappointing really , first to come in with some info but when questionned go missing.

Yeah, I no what you mean, waddyamean

Yes If you subscribe to FOOT-e TIMES SA you get access to all back issues.

Sorry if I am not checking this thread 24/7.

In all honesty, I haven't compiled (nor seen all of) the crowd figures this year.

PhilH wrote:
Yes If you subscribe to FOOT-e TIMES SA you get access to all back issues.

Sorry if I am not checking this thread 24/7.

It's just that you had been on between requests above yet didn't reply . No need to make the smart comment about checking the thread 24/7.

Mr66 wrote:Hi Spelly. I am missing most of this years crowd figures. Would you be able to post them or post a link to them.
I usually get them from Monday's Advertiser but unfortunately it's not delivered to Melbourne anymore.

I will look into this for you Mr66 and then post them on here.

Folks, just a friendly reminder to keep posts about the topic and not about the poster.

Cheers, I am not a prolific poster here and understand this site is trying to be an alternative to SA Footy , rightly so. But I can't see anything personal above ? As much as the site is trying to create an alternative the same posters play the same game on this sit and lets be honest , know how to play the game on forums.

I don't play those games and are prepared to call it when I see it and try not to be personal. I hope you see my point here but I find a few regular posters on forums believing their own self importance. Surely when they "play the game" they ought to be challenged ? I apologise if I have offended but I am not intending to just don't wish to see the site without any challenging otherwise it will become a "yes mans" site. Hope you see my point. I know some do and feel the same.

No need for any apologies, w'mean.

You raise some very good points, in particular about this site not becoming a 'yes man's' site. We've stated all along that there's plenty of room for disagreement about issues and that's the backbone of any site to some extent. Indeed, we'd like to see more debate about the issues facing footy in SA and we encourage all posters to air their views.

Our main point is that we all stick to the issue and not the poster, hence our very mild post, addressed to all of us, about that.

Your reply, though, is exactly how we'd like to see a poster respond to these issues and thanks for that.

Thanks for listening and posting a sensible reply.